
The Iowa blogosphere has been abuzz lately with "comparison" posts featuring the candidates for the third congressional district primary here in the central part of the state.
The incumbent democratic congressman, Leonard Boswell is a veteran of the Iowa senate, the Vietnam war, and was also on the ticket as a candidate for lietenant governor. Fallon's campaign has concluded that Leonard has an extremely conservative voting record. Let's see some of Boswell's votes, and you can judge for yourself.
- Rated 92% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
- Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol. (Jun 2000)
- Voted YES on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
- Rated 38% by the Christian Coalition: mixed voting record on families. (Dec 2003) (Yeah, this low rating will be just fine for Iowa dems)
- Voted YES on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization. (Oct 2007)
- Voted NO on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections. (Sep 2006)
- Voted YES on adding 2 to 4 million children to SCHIP eligibility. (Oct 2007)
- Voted YES on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs. (Jul 2003)
- Rated 89% by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record. (Dec 2003)
- Rated 80% by the AFL-CIO, indicating a pro-union voting record. (Dec 2003)
Are there some votes that I personally disagree with? Yes, no doubt. But the vast majority of Boswell's votes totally fall in line with the average 3rd district voter's profile. He already has a proven record of service, has never been MIA for the democratic party (like Fallon's support of Ralph Nader in 2000), and has a proven working relationship with Senator Tom Harkin, who will be reelected this fall.






Boswell has never been MIA for the Democratic Party?? How about all of the important votes where he broke with the majority of House Democrats: to go to war in Iraq, for warrantless surveillance, tax breaks for big oil and gas, for allowing Bush to decide what counts as torture, to end the moratorium on offshore oil and gas drilling, and the numerous bad votes on the environment earned him a lifetime grade of 57 from the League of Conservation Voters? And he was the deciding vote to pass the Bush-Republican prescription drug plan -- had he voted with the Democrats (who opposed Bush 199-8), the Democrats would have defeated Bush's version 216-215. Jane Norman had a great piece in the Des Moines Register some time back showing what low Democratic loyalty Boswell has had for most of his years in Congress -- several years in the 60's, the 70's, etc. And, BTW, Fallon's lifetime voting score from the AFL-CIO is 88, which is higher than the 80 they gave Boswell. I'd trade Fallon's one mistake of supporting Nader for all of the un-Democratic votes of Boswell's that I just cited. And Fallon apologized for the Nader vote publicly in 2001 and has many times since. So far, I haven't heard Boswell apologize once for his vote to go to war in Iraq and his five years of unwavering support for Bush's war before finally changing his mind last year. Even worse, he is sending out ads making it saying he is "taking on George Bush" on the war. That's the kind of double-talk that makes people cynical about politics.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 20, 2008 6:34 PM | Permalink to Comment