Democratic and Liberal political analysis and commentary

Claire,
I'm an independent who is open to, and frustrated with, the views and actions of both sides of the aisle. If you honestly feel that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are doing an admirable job in leading the Democratic majorities, you are more disillusioned than I thought. Your "blank check" to the Dems needs to be cashed in for a "reality check"!

I reread my post to see if I could figure out what you were talking about. I didn't mention anything about the job that Pelosi or Reid were doing. All I am pointing out are the mathematical realities of the 2008 race.

Since you think the NY Times is doing an excellent job, why dismiss their article about Ms. Clinton's links to Gupta, Infosys and the call lists they create?
"May 26, 2007 New York Times -
Suit Sheds Light on Clintons’ Ties to a Benefactor
By MIKE McINTIRE"

I have read all of the coverage about Hillary Clinton and her ties to Info and the fundraising guy. So far, I find it all pretty unremarkable. I think the republicans are desperate for a scandal to take the public's attention away from the pathetic republicans. If they can prove that Hillary violated any ethics rules, then that would be a story. Until then, I won't be blogging about it.

OK I see. Morally reprehensible and exploitative businesses are ok as contributors, even if they make that money helping defraud the elderly and cancer and Alzheimers' patients. Just as long as the contributions are legal? Ok I got it now. Thanks for clearing that up.

Oh, I'm not a Republican and not trying to create a Hillary Scandal. She is certainly not doing anything illegal. She's too smart for that. It's just kind of disgusting, kind of like investing in tobacco, guns, booze and gambling, or maybe just Halliburton.